Evolution, based on 150 years of combining evidence from many scientific disciplines, cues on the accepted disciplines of geology, biology, paleontology, genetics, ecology, microbiology and behavioral sciences. Evolution advocacies think to withstand scrutiny from either religious or nonreligious policy makers, as concluded by thousands of scientists and agreed upon by an almost equal number of theist advocacies--disbelief also about 50/50 in the different disciplines.
Intelligent Design advocates have promoted the 'anthropic principle' for thousands of years; today, they receive almost equal support from amongst both religionist and scientist supporters, but only by about 50% amongst the two disciplines. The 'Anthropic principle' connotes: this universe and tiny earth were designed solely to support mankind in his superior role as we recognize it.
Obviously, neither brain trust, evolutionist or creationist, predominates one way or another. Advocacy of either extreme, however, does not always mandate superior evidence. But in sentience reality, evolution is obvious in day-to-day experience and is beyond challenge. By the same token, no person has the intellect to deny another's declaration of God belief; which declaration is true in its mere utterance. Therefore, we must search beyond sentience, emotion, and intuition to find the truth in such heart-felt declarations.
Recent studies account and correlate the geologic, astrophysical, evolutionary, biologic, and biblical ages into a harmonious chronology of our Universe as we are able to sense its magnitude. Few would be able to fault the immensity and time-line efficiency thus produced from the evidence in all disciplines susceptible to space and time. And we are aware of mankind's 'time invention' as a measure of earth's behavior and to secure his place in a timeless universe.
Matter is the arbitrator of all masses in the physical world and evolution is inherent in matter's quantum mechanics characteristic. Within the atomic exchanges, brain machinations are source for all polytheism or monotheism disciplines; in the depths of mental chemistry, faith rises as inherence in the belief thus developed. Surely, those with basic evaluation skills can discern the relative truth problematic in each position of enlightenment. Realizing the weakness in mere declarations of evolution hypothesis and in legal-historical assumptions, it behooves thinkers to move beyond theory and intuition, to consult available evidence, and to syllogistically test traditional rationale.
Evolutionary theory suggests, over the passage of several light years, the processes of microevolution (natural selection) and macroevolution (speciation) are responsible for the millions of fungi, animal, and plant species once lived or now living on earth. Unfortunately, fossilized remains do not exist in handy enough occurrence to prove the evolution hypothesis. But the absence of evidence does not preclude the existence of evidence. Therefore, many, with an axe to grind, wildly debate the Evolution/Intelligent Design theories as it might pertain to mortality or immortality issues raised in 'anthropic principle' or accidental element preponderance. Within our calculations and wishful thinking lies a prepotency to error.
Biblical interpretation is a prime example of miscalculation and prepotency to error. Alert to psychological incentives guiding man's immortality yearnings, we count the many miscalculations in tradition's Daniel Chapters alignment and interpretation: the Chapters reordered as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 8, 5, 6, 9, 11, and 12. Correct assembly reveals a surprising biblical Beast identity. Correct identity leads to an early date for John's Revelation and on to correct arrangement of New Testament writings, II Timothy being the last written during Parousia, in A.D. 68. Thus, we reveal two errors in traditional thinking concerning Daniel, John, and 'last days' exposition. Is it not an incentive to discover more about the faulty logic in theist/atheist debate?
Having raised doubt in the assurances claimed in both Evolution and Intelligent Design advocacies, we can recognize the urgent need to prove rightness or wrongness in the positions set forth. Recent research syllogistically resolves the age-old debate between theist and atheist.
Ben Winter, particles physicist, Bible scholar, and author of "THE GREAT DECEPTION: Symbols And Numbers Clarified," reveals there 'is' something new under the sun -- that is, for modern Bible students. He addresses correctness of language and true intent of the major Bible topics: solves Bible mysteries, defines Gog and Magog, reveals Daniel He-goat's surprising identity, and dares to number the all important Ten Ages. Sign up for FREE book critiques at http://www.Winterbriar.com and view more articles in blog format at http://blog.thegreatdeception.net.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น